[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150908020044.GZ26760@linux>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 07:30:44 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
preeti.lkml@...il.com, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/9] cpufreq: governor: Drop __gov_queue_work()
On 08-09-15, 03:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, July 27, 2015 05:58:09 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > __gov_queue_work() isn't required anymore and can be merged with
> > gov_queue_work(). Do it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
>
> Quite frankly I don't see the point.
But isn't that just an unnecessary wrapper ?
> I'd even remove the inline from its definition and let the compiler decide
> what to do with it.
What if the compiler decides to link it? Why add a function call for
(almost) no use?
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists