linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 6/9] cpufreq: ondemand: queue work for policy->cpus together

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150908021309.GC26760@linux>
Date:	Tue, 8 Sep 2015 07:43:09 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	preeti.lkml@...il.com, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 6/9] cpufreq: ondemand: queue work for policy->cpus
 together

On 08-09-15, 07:41, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > >  		next_sampling = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(new_rate);
> > >  		appointed_at = dbs_info->cdbs.dwork.timer.expires;
> > 
> > For that to work we always need to do stuff for policy->cpus in sync.
> > Do we?
> 
> Hmm, we are not in 100% sync for sure. Will check that again.

On the other hand, if we decide to apply 7/9 as well, then this is
anyway going to get removed :)

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/