[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150908122340.GC9751@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 13:23:40 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: "Wu, Songjun" <songjun.wu@...el.com>
Cc: nicolas.ferre@...el.com, lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz,
tiwai@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: atmel-classd: DT binding for Class D audio
amplifier driver
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 05:36:13PM +0800, Wu, Songjun wrote:
> On 9/8/2015 00:25, Mark Brown wrote:
> >Sure, there's no problem at all having that structure in software but it
> >should be possible to do this without having to represent this structure
> >in DT. It should be possible to register the card at the same time as
> >the rest of the components rather than needing the separate device in
> >the DT.
> Do you mean using a single entry in the DT for the whole classD system and
> instantiate ASoC components from it.
> For now, there are two entry, they could be combined to one entry.
Yes, exactly.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists