linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpio: Propagate errors from chip->get()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdbbPizi_x1tYmQ_EePgGTRvpwvezdSmH=BVNciF5b+j9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 8 Sep 2015 15:04:09 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
Cc:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Propagate errors from chip->get()

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 7:16 AM, Bjorn Andersson
<bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com> wrote:

> Linus, Alexandre, please feel free to apply this with -ENOTSUPP in
> accordance to Alexandre's comment in [1], if you prefer that. I picked
> -EIO as that's what's used in most other places when the get() op is
> missing.

I applied as-is for fixes.

> Maybe we should follow up with separate patch to make that consistent?

A patch doing this would be appropriate for devel as it makes
deeper semantic changes.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/