[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaWv6EKcP9COMFKZAyk4FOYTvDTC1RtTG7xjk9TSm_qhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 16:50:30 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 15/22] pinctrl: Use irq_desc_get_xxx() to avoid redundant
lookup of irq_desc
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2015, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Paul Gortmaker
>> <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>> >> From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
>> >>
>> >> Use irq_desc_get_xxx() to avoid redundant lookup of irq_desc while we
>> >> already have a pointer to corresponding irq_desc.
>> >
>> > Hi Linus,
>> >
>> > It seems that linux-next has this copy of the patch as 5663bb27dec1, which
>> > has a stray irq_desc_get_irq_chip in s3c24xx ; (2nd instance of "irq" is
>> > bogus looking.) I first assumed it was from tglx since it did not have any
>> > additional SOB lines, but on further investigation I traced it back to sfr's
>> > merge of pinctrl/for-next.
>>
>> Hm, saw this a bit late I guess.
>>
>> Torvalds has merged my trees, is there a problem in mainline
>> that need to be addressed or did this fix itself?
>
> No, it's buggered in Linus tree as well.
OK fixing it.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists