[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1509082104330.3854@nanos>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 21:05:49 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
cc: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] irqchip: renesas-intc-irqpin: Propagate wake-up
settings to parent
On Tue, 8 Sep 2015, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> The renesas-intc-irqpin interrupt controller is cascaded to the GIC, but
> its driver doesn't propagate wake-up settings to the parent interrupt
> controller.
>
> Since commit aec89ef72ba6c944 ("irqchip/gic: Enable SKIP_SET_WAKE and
> MASK_ON_SUSPEND"), the GIC driver masks interrupts during suspend, and
> wake-up through gpio-keys now fails on r8a7740/armadillo and
> sh73a0/kzm9g.
>
> Fix this by propagating wake-up settings to the parent interrupt
> controller. There's no need to handle irq_set_irq_wake() failures, as
> the renesas-intc-irqpin interrupt controller is always cascaded to a
> GIC, and the GIC driver always sets SKIP_SET_WAKE since the
> aforementioned commit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-intc-irqpin.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-intc-irqpin.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-intc-irqpin.c
> index 0670ab4e3897bf61..457d22c09e352d56 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-intc-irqpin.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-intc-irqpin.c
> @@ -283,6 +283,9 @@ static int intc_irqpin_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> static int intc_irqpin_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on)
> {
> struct intc_irqpin_priv *p = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> + int hw_irq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
> +
> + irq_set_irq_wake(p->irq[hw_irq].requested_irq, on);
Are you sure that this does not make lockdep unhappy due to lock
nesting?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists