[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55EF45DC.9030401@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 22:32:28 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: gleb@...nel.org, mtosatti@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] KVM: VMX: introduce set_clear_2nd_exec_ctrl()
On 08/09/2015 16:24, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>
>> The second argument is always true.
>
> No...
>
> There are 3 places calling this function with set=falseļ¼
> nested_release_vmcs12(), vmx_disable_pml() and
> vmx_cpuid_update()
You're right. It's always constant---I don't know why I wrote it's
always true, and then suggested vmcs_clear32...
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists