linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc: define empty enable_kernel_vsx() when CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 Sep 2015 08:47:35 +1000
From:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>
To:	tim.gardner@...onical.com
Cc:	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	Leonidas Da Silva Barbosa <leosilva@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: define empty enable_kernel_vsx() when
 CONFIG_VSX=n

On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 12:13:11PM -0600, tim.gardner@...onical.com wrote:
> From: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>
> 
> commit 72cd7b44bc99 ("powerpc: Uncomment and make enable_kernel_vsx()
> routine available") neglected to define an empty inline replacement for
> enable_kernel_vsx() when CONFIG_VSX=n.

If code that wants to call enable_kernel_vsx() is getting compiled in
when CONFIG_VSX=n, that's a worry.  Is this patch motivated by an
actual compile failure?  If so what was the failure?

Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/