[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150908224735.GA12791@fergus.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 08:47:35 +1000
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>
To: tim.gardner@...onical.com
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Leonidas Da Silva Barbosa <leosilva@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: define empty enable_kernel_vsx() when
CONFIG_VSX=n
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 12:13:11PM -0600, tim.gardner@...onical.com wrote:
> From: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>
>
> commit 72cd7b44bc99 ("powerpc: Uncomment and make enable_kernel_vsx()
> routine available") neglected to define an empty inline replacement for
> enable_kernel_vsx() when CONFIG_VSX=n.
If code that wants to call enable_kernel_vsx() is getting compiled in
when CONFIG_VSX=n, that's a worry. Is this patch motivated by an
actual compile failure? If so what was the failure?
Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists