linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 Sep 2015 08:56:03 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Eric B Munson <emunson@...mai.com>,
	"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip
 tree

Hi Linus,

On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 11:11:25 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > The below patch was missed when the userfaultfd stuff and the x86 changes
> > were merged.  I have repeated the patch in the clear below.
> 
> When forwarding patches, please add your sign-off. I can see (and
> apply) the original in this thread, so I guess it doesn't matter in
> this particular case, but in general that's what you should be doing
> so that I don't then have to find the other email just to apply the
> patch from the original author.

Ooops, sorry about that.  I really should know better.

> Also, this wasn't actually a real merge error. This was just a bug in
> the whole process. Andrew's patches sent to me had been updated with
> the right number for all the other cases, why hadn't this been folded
> into the series too? Apparently Andrew's series has simply been buggy
> for the last month or more, and that was true even before it was sent
> to me and while it was cooking in -next.. Tssk.

I have been applying that patch I sent to you to -next for some time.
I guess I expected Andrew to pick it up when he rebased his patch
series before submitting it to you.  These things sometimes slip
through the cracks.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/