linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] ACPI: add in a bad_madt_entry() function to eventually replace the macro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 8 Sep 2015 17:00:05 -0600
From:	Al Stone <ahs3@...hat.com>
To:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc:	"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
	"patches@...aro.org" <patches@...aro.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] ACPI: add in a bad_madt_entry() function to
 eventually replace the macro

On 09/07/2015 09:32 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi Al,
> 
> On 19/08/15 23:07, Al Stone wrote:
> 
> I finally got a chance to try this series on Juno. Well it exposed a firmware
> bug in MADT table :)

What?  The code did what it was supposed to do :-)?  Very cool.  Good to know.

I talked to Graeme a bit, too, and he had some good suggestions for clean up.
I'll post a v3 tomorrow.

> [..]
> 
>>                  acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler,
>> @@ -245,6 +484,8 @@ acpi_parse_entries(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
>>                 table_end) {
>>                  if (entry->type == entry_id
>>                      && (!max_entries || count < max_entries)) {
>> +                       if (bad_madt_entry(table_header, entry))
>> +                               return -EINVAL;
> 
> Not sure if we can have the above check here unconditionally.
> Currently I can see there are 2 other users of acpi_parse_entries i.e.
> PCC and NUMA. So may be it can be made conditional or return success for
> non-MADT tables from bad_madt_entry ?

I'll double check these uses.  I thought I had before, and based on what I
saw the check would be reasonable.  It never hurts to check again, though.

> Other than that, you can add for ARM64 specific parts:
> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>

Thanks!

> Regards,
> Sudeep
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


-- 
ciao,
al
-----------------------------------
Al Stone
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.
ahs3@...hat.com
-----------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/