linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150908162115.fc494463.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 8 Sep 2015 16:21:15 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Eric B Munson <emunson@...mai.com>,
	"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip
 tree

On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 16:03:23 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > I have been applying that patch I sent to you to -next for some time.
> > I guess I expected Andrew to pick it up when he rebased his patch
> > series before submitting it to you.  These things sometimes slip
> > through the cracks.
> 
> I suspect Andrew saw that patch, and thought it was a merge fixup like
> you sometimes send out, and didn't realize that it actually applied
> directly to his series.

I've had it all the time, as a post-linux-next fixup - the idea being
that I send it to you after its linux-next preconditions have been
merged up.

However I failed to put that patch inside the stephen-take-these-bits
markers, so it never went from -mm into -next.

New syscalls are rather a pain, both from the patch-monkeying POV and
also because nobody knows what the syscall numbers will be until
everything lands in mainline.  Oh well, it doesn't happen often and
it's easy stuff.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/