[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150909142608.GP12596@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 16:26:08 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/8] sched/completion: convert completions to use
simple wait queues
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 02:05:29PM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> @@ -50,10 +50,10 @@ void complete_all(struct completion *x)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&x->wait.lock, flags);
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&x->wait.lock, flags);
> x->done += UINT_MAX/2;
> - __wake_up_locked(&x->wait, TASK_NORMAL, 0);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&x->wait.lock, flags);
> + swake_up_locked(&x->wait);
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&x->wait.lock, flags);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(complete_all);
I don't think that's correct; __wake_up_locked(.nr=0) would wake all
waiters, where swake_up_locked() will only wake one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists