lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 9 Sep 2015 13:07:04 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Mike Rapoport <mike.rapoport@...il.com>
Cc:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
	Teddy Wang <teddy.wang@...iconmotion.com>,
	Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@...torindia.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/17] staging: sm750fb: rename swI2CInit to
 sm750_sw_i2c_init

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:03:20PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:41:20AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 09:17:56AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > Fix the checkpatch warning about CamelCase.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <mike.rapoport@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c  | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.h  | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750_hw.c      | 2 +-
> > >  4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c
> > > index 3d129aa..241b77b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c
> > > @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ long sii164InitChip(
> > >  	/* Use fast mode. */
> > >  	sm750_hw_i2c_init(1);
> > >  #else
> > > -	swI2CInit(DEFAULT_I2C_SCL, DEFAULT_I2C_SDA);
> > > +	sm750_sw_i2c_init(DEFAULT_I2C_SCL, DEFAULT_I2C_SDA);
> > 
> > Hm, wait, "sw_"?  what is the difference between the hw and sw versions?
> 
> As far as I understood, the intention for HW is for using i2c
> controller, and SW is for using gpio bit-bang

big-bang i2c?  ick.

Ok, maybe your original choices made more sense.  Can you review them
again and resend if you feel they are ok?  They are now gone from my
queue, sorry.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ