[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 07:41:25 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, olof@...om.net,
khilman@...nel.org, afaerber@...e.de,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: Make FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER configurable if
ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 11:19:13PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 10:38:04PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> > This patch makes FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER configurable in defconfig for ARMV7-M
> > when built for a single platform.
>
> I'd prefer if we didn't do this, because this isn't supposed to be a user
> visible "option". It's an option that was introduced to avoid having to
> throw masses of #ifdefs into the definition of MAX_ZONEORDER.
>
> The problem with it is that it's a "well, what do I set this to?" option
> and that leads to "oh, I'll just choose the default because I don't know
> any better".
>
> Do we know why EFM32 needs a value of 9 here? It's not documented in
> the original commit, and it really _should_ have been.
IIRC it was done because of memory pressure. But not sure this makes any
sense. I will try with the default value later today and report back.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists