linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/6] Staging: iio: impedance-analyzer: Prefer using the BIT macro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1509100756440.2148@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date:	Thu, 10 Sep 2015 07:57:30 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To:	Shraddha Barke <shraddha.6596@...il.com>
cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
	Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
	Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] Staging: iio: impedance-analyzer: Prefer using the
 BIT macro

On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Shraddha Barke wrote:

> This patch replaces bit shifting on 1 with the BIT(x) macro
> as it's extensively used by other function in this driver.
> 
> This was done with coccinelle:
> @@ int g; @@
> 
> -(1 << g)
> +BIT(g)

This doesn't look like a good idea here, since there is a mixture of uses 
of BIT and other things for similar values.

julia

> Signed-off-by: Shraddha Barke <shraddha.6596@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c b/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c
> index c18109c..48acad0 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
>  #define AD5933_REG_IMAG_DATA		0x96	/* R, 2 bytes*/
>  
>  /* AD5933_REG_CONTROL_HB Bits */
> -#define AD5933_CTRL_INIT_START_FREQ	(0x1 << 4)
> +#define AD5933_CTRL_INIT_START_FREQ	BIT(4)
>  #define AD5933_CTRL_START_SWEEP		(0x2 << 4)
>  #define AD5933_CTRL_INC_FREQ		(0x3 << 4)
>  #define AD5933_CTRL_REPEAT_FREQ		(0x4 << 4)
> @@ -48,23 +48,23 @@
>  #define AD5933_CTRL_STANDBY		(0xB << 4)
>  
>  #define AD5933_CTRL_RANGE_2000mVpp	(0x0 << 1)
> -#define AD5933_CTRL_RANGE_200mVpp	(0x1 << 1)
> +#define AD5933_CTRL_RANGE_200mVpp	BIT(1)
>  #define AD5933_CTRL_RANGE_400mVpp	(0x2 << 1)
>  #define AD5933_CTRL_RANGE_1000mVpp	(0x3 << 1)
>  #define AD5933_CTRL_RANGE(x)		((x) << 1)
>  
> -#define AD5933_CTRL_PGA_GAIN_1		(0x1 << 0)
> +#define AD5933_CTRL_PGA_GAIN_1		BIT(0)
>  #define AD5933_CTRL_PGA_GAIN_5		(0x0 << 0)
>  
>  /* AD5933_REG_CONTROL_LB Bits */
> -#define AD5933_CTRL_RESET		(0x1 << 4)
> +#define AD5933_CTRL_RESET		BIT(4)
>  #define AD5933_CTRL_INT_SYSCLK		(0x0 << 3)
> -#define AD5933_CTRL_EXT_SYSCLK		(0x1 << 3)
> +#define AD5933_CTRL_EXT_SYSCLK		BIT(3)
>  
>  /* AD5933_REG_STATUS Bits */
> -#define AD5933_STAT_TEMP_VALID		(0x1 << 0)
> -#define AD5933_STAT_DATA_VALID		(0x1 << 1)
> -#define AD5933_STAT_SWEEP_DONE		(0x1 << 2)
> +#define AD5933_STAT_TEMP_VALID		BIT(0)
> +#define AD5933_STAT_DATA_VALID		BIT(1)
> +#define AD5933_STAT_SWEEP_DONE		BIT(2)
>  
>  /* I2C Block Commands */
>  #define AD5933_I2C_BLOCK_WRITE		0xA0
> @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static int ad5933_set_freq(struct ad5933_state *st,
>  		u8 d8[4];
>  	} dat;
>  
> -	freqreg = (u64) freq * (u64) (1 << 27);
> +	freqreg = (u64) freq * (u64) BIT(27);
>  	do_div(freqreg, st->mclk_hz / 4);
>  
>  	switch (reg) {
> @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static ssize_t ad5933_show_frequency(struct device *dev,
>  	freqreg = be32_to_cpu(dat.d32) & 0xFFFFFF;
>  
>  	freqreg = (u64) freqreg * (u64) (st->mclk_hz / 4);
> -	do_div(freqreg, 1 << 27);
> +	do_div(freqreg, BIT(27));
>  
>  	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", (int) freqreg);
>  }
> @@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ static ssize_t ad5933_store(struct device *dev,
>  
>  		/* 2x, 4x handling, see datasheet */
>  		if (val > 511)
> -			val = (val >> 1) | (1 << 9);
> +			val = (val >> 1) | BIT(9);
>  		else if (val > 1022)
>  			val = (val >> 2) | (3 << 9);
>  
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/