linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] selftests/seccomp: add support for s390

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 Sep 2015 19:11:16 +1000
From:	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jan Willeke <willeke@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	heicars2@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/seccomp: add support for s390

On Wed, 2015-09-09 at 10:23 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com> wrote:
> > On 09/09/2015 10:45 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> >> On 09/09/2015 10:40 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> >>>> This adds support for s390 to the seccomp selftests. Some improvements
> >>>> were made to enhance the accuracy of failure reporting, and additional
> >>>> tests were added to validate assumptions about the currently traced
> >>>> syscall. Also adds early asserts for running on older kernels to avoid
> >>>> noise when the seccomp syscall is not implemented.
> >>
> >> Sorry looks like it got lost in my LinuxCon backlog. I will queue it
> >> up for 4.3-rc1.
> >
> > Hmm. It doesn't apply to linux-kselftest next. Based on your comment
> >
> > "This applies on top of -next, following the addition of the powerpc
> > tests."
> 
> Well, it was -next when I sent it. :) The powerpc changes are now in
> Linus's tree, so there should be no problem. Is your linux-kselftest
> merged with 4.3-rc yet?

Right, it applies cleanly to Linus' tree as of ~now (b8889c4fc6ba).

So it should be fine to go via the selftest tree as a fix for rc1.

cheers


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/