[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150910100604.GT3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:06:04 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@....com>,
"sgurrappadi@...dia.com" <sgurrappadi@...dia.com>,
"pang.xunlei@....com.cn" <pang.xunlei@....com.cn>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by
capacity_orig
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 03:07:48AM +0800, Yuyang Du wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 02:52:05PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > +#if (SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT - SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION) != 10 || SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT != 10
> > +#error "load tracking assumes 2^10 as unit"
> > +#endif
> > +
>
> Sorry for late response. I might already missed somthing.
>
> But I got a bit lost here, with:
>
> #define SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT (10 + SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION)
> #define SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT 10
>
> the #if is certainly false.
That is intended, triggering #error would be 'bad'.
The reason for this bit is to raise a stink if someone 'accidentally'
changes one of these values and expects things to just work.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists