linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] perf, x86: Fix multi-segment problem of perf_event_intel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150910102322.GV3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:23:22 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
	hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf, x86: Fix multi-segment problem of
 perf_event_intel_uncore

On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 02:28:36AM +0900, Taku Izumi wrote:

> +struct pci2phy_map *__find_pci2phy_map(int segment)
> +{
> +	struct pci2phy_map *map;
> +
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&pci2phy_map_lock);
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(map, &pci2phy_map_head, list) {
> +		if (map->segment == segment)
> +			return map;
> +	}
> +
> +	map = kmalloc(sizeof(struct pci2phy_map), GFP_ATOMIC);

So Ingo would really rather you didn't add a GFP_ATOMIC here; they are
rather fragile.

  http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150901113147.GA11161@gmail.com

I figured you'd come up with something... :/

> +	if (map) {
> +		map->segment = segment;
> +		list_add_tail(&map->list, &pci2phy_map_head);
> +	}
> +
> +	return map;
> +}


Something like this might work; but please consider it carefully,
because I certainly didn't.

struct pci2phy_map *__find_pci2phy_map(int segment)
{
	struct pci2phy_map *map, *alloc = NULL;

	lockdep_assert_held(&pci2phy_map_lock);

retry:
	list_for_each_entry(map, &pci2phy_map_head, list) {
		if (map->segment == segment)
			goto done;
	}

	if (!alloc) {
		raw_spin_unlock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
		alloc = kmalloc(sizeof(struct pci2phy_map), GFP_KERNEL);
		raw_spin_lock(&pci2phy_map_lock);

		if (alloc)
			goto retry;

		return NULL;
	} else {
		map = alloc;
		alloc = NULL;
	}

	map->segment = segment;
	list_add_tail(&map->list, &pci2phy_map_head);

done:
	if (alloc)
		kfree(alloc);

	return map;
}


> @@ -1106,16 +1107,26 @@ static int snbep_pci2phy_map_init(int devid)
>  		err = pci_read_config_dword(ubox_dev, 0x54, &config);
>  		if (err)
>  			break;
> +
> +		segment = pci_domain_nr(ubox_dev->bus);
> +		raw_spin_lock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
> +		map = __find_pci2phy_map(segment);
> +		if (!map) {
> +			err = -ENOMEM;
> +			break;

And here you leak the lock..

> +		}
> +
>  		/*
>  		 * every three bits in the Node ID mapping register maps
>  		 * to a particular node.
>  		 */
>  		for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
>  			if (nodeid == ((config >> (3 * i)) & 0x7)) {
> -				uncore_pcibus_to_physid[bus] = i;
> +				map->pbus_to_physid[bus] = i;
>  				break;
>  			}
>  		}
> +		raw_spin_unlock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
>  	}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/