linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] efi/libstub/fdt: Standardize the names of EFI stub parameters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1441889905.24450.382.camel@citrix.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:58:25 +0100
From:	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
To:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
CC:	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"daniel.kiper@...cle.com" <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>,
	"ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"leif.lindholm@...aro.org" <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xen.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
	"julien.grall@...rix.com" <julien.grall@...rix.com>,
	"freebsd-arm@...ebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@...ebsd.org>,
	"matt.fleming@...el.com" <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	"christoffer.dall@...aro.org" <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
	"jbeulich@...e.com" <jbeulich@...e.com>,
	Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@...wei.com>,
	"peter.huangpeng@...wei.com" <peter.huangpeng@...wei.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"shannon.zhao@...aro.org" <shannon.zhao@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] efi/libstub/fdt: Standardize the names of
 EFI stub parameters

On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 13:15 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:

> > In any case this should be separate from the shim ABI discussion.
> 
> I disagree; I think this is very much relevant to the ABI discussion.
> That's not to say that I insist on a particular approach, but I think
> that they need to be considered together.

Taking a step back, the reason for using the EFI stub parameters is only
(AFAIK) in order to be able to locate the ACPI RDSP (the root table
pointer), which as it happens is normally passed via one of the EFI
firmware tables.

If there was a way to achieve that goal (i.e. another way to find the RSDP)
without opening the can of UEFI worms then we could consider that opiton
too.

a way != the legacy x86 thing of scanning low memory of the signature, of
course.

Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/