[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150910130750.GA20055@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 15:07:50 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] check_for_tasks: read_lock(tasklist_lock) doesn't need to
disable irqs
check_for_tasks() doesn't need to disable irqs, recursive read_lock()
from interrupt is fine.
While at it, s/do_each_thread/for_each_process_thread/.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
kernel/cpu.c | 8 ++++----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 94bbe46..24551f2 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -302,8 +302,8 @@ static inline void check_for_tasks(int dead_cpu)
{
struct task_struct *g, *p;
- read_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
- do_each_thread(g, p) {
+ read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+ for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
if (!p->on_rq)
continue;
/*
@@ -318,8 +318,8 @@ static inline void check_for_tasks(int dead_cpu)
pr_warn("Task %s (pid=%d) is on cpu %d (state=%ld, flags=%x)\n",
p->comm, task_pid_nr(p), dead_cpu, p->state, p->flags);
- } while_each_thread(g, p);
- read_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
+ }
+ read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
}
struct take_cpu_down_param {
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists