linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] arm64: updates for 4.3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150910170257.GH22439@arm.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 Sep 2015 18:02:57 +0100
From:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:	Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arm64: updates for 4.3

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 05:58:43PM +0100, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> >
> >   * Hide direct DCC access from userspace
> 
> Doesn't this make sense only if DCC is enabled for ARM64?  These
> patches are not part of your patchset:
> 
> [v5] ARM64: TTY: hvc_dcc: Add support for ARM64 dcc
> [v3] hvc_dcc: don't ignore errors during initialization

Those patches should go via the usual route for tty changes (i.e. Greg).
I merged the arm64 change here because it (a) makes sense as a standalone
patch and (b) is a dependency for your other stuff.

Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/