[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F0770192290F@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 20:14:08 +0000
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
"Frederic Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 04/13] perf env: Introduce read_cpu_topology_map() method
> Em Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 08:00:54PM +0000, Liang, Kan escreveu:
> > > Em Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 09:41:18PM +0000, Liang, Kan escreveu:
> > > > > - for (i = 0; i < tp->cpu_nr; i++) {
> > > > > - ret = do_write(fd, &tp->core_id[i], sizeof(int));
> > > > > + perf_env__read_cpu_topology_map(&perf_env);
> > > > > +
>
> > > > I think we need to handle error here.
>
> > > Ok, adding a test, updated patch below. While doing that, noticed
> > > that the in the thread_sib case the "ret = do_something()" doesn't
> > > makes the whole function fail, will fix later.
>
> > Except patch 11 & 13 (for reverting), the rest of patches are good to me.
>
> Ok, so, to take it more formally, can I turn this "good to me" as justification
> for adding "Acked-by: Kan Liang", to those patches?
Yes.
>
> Please take a look at the other patches in the perf/env branch, I did it while
> trying to figure it out if the reverts should be kept.
>
OK
Thanks,
Kan
> - Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists