[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150911081753.GK9650@linux>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 13:47:53 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Pi-Cheng Chen <pi-cheng.chen@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cpufreq: mediatek: allow modular build
On 11-09-15, 10:15, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The newly merged cpufreq-mt8173 driver breaks the ARM allmodconfig
> build because of a dependency on the cpu-cooling infrastructure that
> may be built as a loadable module:
>
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `mtk_cpufreq_ready':
> binder.c:(.text+0x324c8c): undefined reference to `of_cpufreq_cooling_register'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `mtk_cpufreq_exit':
> binder.c:(.text+0x324ea0): undefined reference to `cpufreq_cooling_unregister'
>
> This works around the issue by allowing this driver to be built
> as a module as well, and adding a dependency on THERMAL that prevents
> it from being built-in when the cpu-cooling driver is a module.
>
> This is not perfect because there is still a case where THERMAL=m
> and CPU_COOLING=n that should allow us to have this driver built-in
> as well, but I decided to follow existing practice in other drivers
> here, and that case seems irrelevant in practice.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> I have not checked if someone else has already sent a patch for this,
> just ignore mine if the issue has been fixed already.
5269e7067cd6 ("cpufreq: Add ARM_MT8173_CPUFREQ dependency on THERMAL")
in Rafael's tree. Its a bit different, so have a look.
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists