[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150911121935.4abc99c6.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 12:19:35 +0200
From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: gleb@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mst@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/4] kvm: fix double free for fast mmio eventfd
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:25:45 +0800
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 09/11/2015 03:46 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:17:35 +0800
> > Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
> >> +
> >> + /* When length is ignored, MMIO is also put on a separate bus, for
> >> + * faster lookups.
> >> + */
> >> + if (!args->len && !(args->flags & KVM_IOEVENTFD_FLAG_PIO)) {
> > Dito on a positive check for bus_idx == KVM_MMIO_BUS.
>
> I was thinking maybe this should be done in a separate patch on top.
> What's your opinion?
The check is an independent issue, an extra patch is fine (current
usage does not trigger any problems).
>
> >> + ret = kvm_assign_ioeventfd_idx(kvm, KVM_FAST_MMIO_BUS, args);
> >> + if (ret < 0)
> >> + goto fast_fail;
> >> + }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists