[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55F2AD98.3050605@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 12:31:52 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Feng Wu <feng.wu@...el.com>, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
joro@...tes.org, mtosatti@...hat.com
Cc: eric.auger@...aro.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 12/17] KVM: Implement IRQ bypass consumer callbacks for
x86
On 25/08/2015 10:50, Feng Wu wrote:
> + struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd =
> + container_of(cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd, consumer);
> +
> + irqfd->producer = prod;
This assignment should be under "if (kvm_x86_ops->update_pi_irte)".
> + return kvm_arch_update_pi_irte(irqfd->kvm, prod->irq, irqfd->gsi, 1);
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons,
> + struct irq_bypass_producer *prod)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd =
> + container_of(cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd, consumer);
> +
> + irqfd->producer = NULL;
And here it should be like:
if (!kvm_x86_ops->update_pi_irte) {
WARN_ON(irqfd->producer != NULL);
return;
}
WARN_ON(irqfd->producer != prod);
irqfd->producer = NULL;
Paolo
> +
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists