[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55F2AFED.5040306@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 12:41:49 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Feng Wu <feng.wu@...el.com>, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
joro@...tes.org, mtosatti@...hat.com
Cc: eric.auger@...aro.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 11/17] KVM: Define two weak arch callbacks for irq
bypass manager
On 25/08/2015 10:50, Feng Wu wrote:
> Define two weak arch callbacks so that archs that don't need
> them don't need define them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@...el.com>
> ---
> virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> index d7a230f..f3050b9 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> @@ -256,6 +256,16 @@ static void irqfd_update(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd)
> write_seqcount_end(&irqfd->irq_entry_sc);
> }
>
> +void __attribute__((weak)) kvm_arch_irq_bypass_stop(
> + struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +void __attribute__((weak)) kvm_arch_irq_bypass_start(
> + struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons)
> +{
> +}
> +
> static int
> kvm_irqfd_assign(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irqfd *args)
> {
>
This would belong into the patch that adds CONFIG_KVM_HAVE_IRQ_BYPASS
(and the functions should be under "#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_HAVE_IRQ_BYPASS").
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists