[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55F2CECB.10801@citrix.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 13:53:31 +0100
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@...rix.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@...aro.org>
CC: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] irqchip: GIC: Convert to EOImode == 1
On 11/09/15 12:09, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 11/09/15 11:59, Julien Grall wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/09/2015 11:54, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 17:23 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>> I applied the two patches on top of linus/master and I'm able to boot
>>>> correctly on X-gene. Thank you!
>>>
>>> Perhaps we should replicate this approach in Xen and get rid of
>>> PLATFORM_QUIRK_GIC_64K_STRIDE?
>>
>> I was thinking to do it. But, I wasn't sure if it was worth to get a
>> such "ugly" patch compare to the quirk.
>
> It is not a quirk. It is actually recommended in the SBSA spec. The
> patch is ugly because we can't do the right thing on the one platform
> that actually implemented ARM's own recommendation (we can't tell the
> bloody firmware to stop overriding our DT).
>
> I would otherwise have added a "arm,use-sbsa-aliasing" property (or
> something similar) instead of trying to guess things...
I will give a look to port this patch on Xen.
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists