linux-kernel - Re: static key arrays?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1441983308.2083.13.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:	Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:55:08 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: static key arrays?

On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 16:41 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> 
> That's inconvenient for large arrays. I think the 'or something' would
> be the range initialization supported by gcc (and I think also clang):
> 
> struct static_key_false array[N] = { [0 ... N-1] = STATIC_KEY_FALSE_INIT };
> 

Ah, I wasn't aware of that extension. That's indeed much more
convenient than the CPP trick I was thinking of :)

johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/