[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150911162207.GD3447@danjae.kornet>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 01:22:07 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, lizefan@...wei.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pi3orama@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Fix segfault in 'perf top'
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 04:59:11AM +0000, Wang Nan wrote:
> 'perf top' segfaults with following operation:
>
> # perf top -e page-faults -p 15173 # 15173 never generate page-fault
>
> Then on the resulting empty interface, press right key:
>
> # ./perf top -e page-faults -p 11400
> perf: Segmentation fault
> -------- backtrace --------
> ./perf[0x535428]
> /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x3545f)[0x7f0dd360745f]
> ./perf[0x531d46]
> ./perf(perf_evlist__tui_browse_hists+0x96)[0x5340d6]
> ./perf[0x44ba2f]
> /lib64/libpthread.so.0(+0x81d0)[0x7f0dd49dc1d0]
> /lib64/libc.so.6(clone+0x6c)[0x7f0dd36b90dc]
>
> The bug reside in perf_evsel__hists_browse() that, in the above circumstance
> browser->selection can be NULL, but code after skip_annotation doesn't consider
> it.
>
> This patch fix it by checing browser->selection before fetching
> browser->selection->map and browser->selection->sym.
I'm ok with this change, just a nitpick below..
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c b/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c
> index e4fd40f..b00fa92 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c
> @@ -2017,7 +2017,8 @@ skip_annotation:
> &options[nr_options], dso);
> nr_options += add_map_opt(browser, &actions[nr_options],
> &options[nr_options],
> - browser->selection->map);
> + browser->selection ?
> + browser->selection->map : NULL);
> nr_options += add_socket_opt(browser, &actions[nr_options],
> &options[nr_options],
> socket);
> @@ -2030,7 +2031,10 @@ skip_annotation:
> nr_options += add_script_opt(browser,
> &actions[nr_options],
> &options[nr_options],
> - NULL, browser->selection->sym);
> + NULL,
> + browser->selection ?
> + browser->selection->sym :
> + NULL);
Is this really needed? IIUC browser->selection is not NULL if
browser->he_selection is not NULL. Did you see a case it's NULL?
Also passing a NULL thread and a NULL sym is meaningless here since
it's a duplication..
Thanks,
Namhyung
> }
> nr_options += add_script_opt(browser, &actions[nr_options],
> &options[nr_options], NULL, NULL);
> --
> 1.8.3.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists