linux-kernel - Re: [Patch V1] x86, mce: CPU synchronization for broadcast MCE's is surprised by offline CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150911175508.GF2042@pd.tnic>
Date:	Fri, 11 Sep 2015 19:55:08 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch V1] x86, mce: CPU synchronization for broadcast MCE's is
 surprised by offline CPUs

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 02:03:03PM -0400, Raj, Ashok wrote:
> I think using gen_pool should be fine. Also seems the notify moved to
> the mce_gen_pool_process(), so there should be no notifier calls from
> the offline cpu.
>
> Let me take a respin and resend. I should have noticed.. apologies.

No worries. :)

This is to prove Tony wrong who thinks that nothing happens in MCA land. :-P

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/