linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] crypto: [sha] glue code for Intel SHA extensions optimized SHA1 & SHA256

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150911.121509.844598934515668336.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 11 Sep 2015 12:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com
Cc:	smueller@...onox.de, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, hpa@...or.com,
	sean.m.gulley@...el.com, mouli_7982@...oo.com,
	vinodh.gopal@...el.com, james.guilford@...el.com,
	wajdi.k.feghali@...el.com, jussi.kivilinna@....fi,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] crypto: [sha] glue code for Intel SHA extensions
 optimized SHA1 & SHA256

From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:49:32 -0700

> Still, why would some kernel module specifically not want to 
> use the fastest HW implementation, and explicitly ask for
> a slower driver?

Temporary workaround if a bug is found.

There is really no reason to prevent the user from having this
flexibility, and in return anyone can test any implementation
their cpu can support.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/