[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1442007315.2909.49.camel@freescale.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:35:15 -0500
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, <sojkam1@....cvut.cz>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc32: memcpy: only use dcbz once cache is
enabled
On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 16:33 +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> memcpy() uses instruction dcbz to speed up copy by not wasting time
> loading cache line with data that will be overwritten.
> Some platform like mpc52xx do no have cache active at startup and
> can therefore not use memcpy(). Allthough no part of the code
> explicitly uses memcpy(), GCC makes calls to it.
>
> This patch modifies memcpy() such that at startup, memcpy()
> unconditionally jumps to generic_memcpy() which doesn't use
> the dcbz instruction.
>
> Once the initial MMU is set up, in machine_init() we patch memcpy()
> by replacing this inconditional jump by a NOP
>
> Reported-by: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@....cvut.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
> ---
> changes in v2:
> Using feature-fixups instead of hardcoded call to patch_instruction()
> Handling of memset() added
> changes in v3:
> Not using anymore feature-fixups
> Handling of memset() removed
Why was handling of memset() removed?
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists