[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150911232616.GE13472@usrtlx11787.corpusers.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:26:16 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
To: Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2] firmware: qcom: scm: Add function stubs for ARM64
On Fri 11 Sep 14:01 PDT 2015, Andy Gross wrote:
> This patch adds stubs for the SCM functions exposed in the QCOM SCM API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/Kconfig | 8 +++++
> drivers/firmware/Makefile | 3 +-
> drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/Kconfig b/drivers/firmware/Kconfig
> index 99c69a3..72720eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/Kconfig
> @@ -136,6 +136,14 @@ config QCOM_SCM
> bool
> depends on ARM || ARM64
>
> +config QCOM_SCM_32
> + def_bool y
> + depends on QCOM_SCM && ARM
> +
> +config QCOM_SCM_64
> + def_bool y
> + depends on QCOM_SCM && ARM64
> +
So if QCOM_SCM is selected by a consumer then the dependencies here will
be met and the correct implementation will be chosen, as these aren't
possible to deselect?
I guess that's an okay approach, so:
Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists