[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150912011449.GP22011@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Sat, 12 Sep 2015 02:14:51 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Pádraig Brady <P@...igBrady.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	avagin@...nvz.org,
	Ludovic Courtès <ludo@....org>
Subject: Re: query re unlink() ... inotify ... open() race
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 01:28:27AM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> The open() succeeding is surprising. Is that allowed?
> The summary of the sequence in the kernel is:
> 
>   vfs_unlink() {
>     mutex_lock(&(dentry->d_inode->i_mutex));
>     security_inode_unlink(dir, dentry);
>     try_break_deleg(target, delegated_inode);
>     dir->i_op->unlink(dir, dentry);
>     dont_mount(dentry);
>     detach_mounts(dentry);
>     mutex_unlock(&(dentry->d_inode->i_mutex));
> 
>     fsnotify_link_count(target)
>     d_delete(dentry);
>   }
... and ->unlink() is the one to decrement the link count.  With lookup
via dcache coming at some point after that.  idiotify is a red herring
here - stat(2) will report decremented link count just as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
