| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 08:49:05 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: Shraddha Barke <shraddha.6596@...il.com> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>, Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>, Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] Staging: iio: cdc: Prefer using the BIT macro On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 04:47:23PM +0530, Shraddha Barke wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote: > > On 10/09/15 17:32, Shraddha Barke wrote: > > This patch replaces bit shifting on 1 with the BIT(x) macro > > > > This was done with coccinelle: > > @@ int g; @@ > > > > -(1 << g) > > +BIT(g) > > > > Signed-off-by: Shraddha Barke <shraddha.6596@...il.com> > Something odd happened here as this is only a small proportion of the cases > that should be updated in this file. There's one at the bottom of the > patch for starters! > > > I didn't apply BIT(x) for mixed cases.I think I should drop this patch > altogether but > Greg has added it. Will it cause problems ? :( Greg can always drop it :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists