linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 12 Sep 2015 10:41:23 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah.kh@...sung.com,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review

On 09/12/2015 08:55 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:56:03PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:48:59PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.88 release.
>>> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Sun Sep 13 22:45:08 UTC 2015.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>> Compiled and booted on x86_32. No errors in dmesg.
>>
>> cross_compiled with allmodconfig:
>>
>> i386 - pass
>> x86_64 - pass
>> alphacheck - pass
>> arm - pass
>> cris - failed
>
> Is this expected?
>
I don't test this one.

>> m68k - pass
>> mips - pass
>> powerpc - pass
>> s390 - failed
>
> Is this expected?
>
Yes.

>> sparc - pass
>> sparc64 - pass
>> tile - failed
>> tilegx - failed

Yes. Looks like it was fixed somewhere between 3.11 and 3.13,
though I did not track down the commit.

>> xtensa - failed
>

xtensa:allmodconfig builds for me, using my own toolchain.
I see that kind of failure if I build for one endianness,
then for the other, without cleaning up in between.

Guenter

> Are these all new failures?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/