linux-kernel - [PATCH 2.6.32 23/62] jbd2: fix r_count overflows leading to buffer overflow in journal recovery

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150912225607.556001249@1wt.eu>
Date:	Sun, 13 Sep 2015 00:56:29 +0200
From:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: [PATCH 2.6.32 23/62] jbd2: fix r_count overflows leading to buffer overflow
 in journal recovery

2.6.32-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>

commit e531d0bceb402e643a4499de40dd3fa39d8d2e43 upstream.

The journal revoke block recovery code does not check r_count for
sanity, which means that an evil value of r_count could result in
the kernel reading off the end of the revoke table and into whatever
garbage lies beyond.  This could crash the kernel, so fix that.

However, in testing this fix, I discovered that the code to write
out the revoke tables also was not correctly checking to see if the
block was full -- the current offset check is fine so long as the
revoke table space size is a multiple of the record size, but this
is not true when either journal_csum_v[23] are set.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: journal checksumming is not supported, so only
 the first fix is needed]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
(cherry picked from commit 2f6a2bcc01bc9ed73bfb4d698da94ed2a5fcb18c)

Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
---
 fs/jbd2/recovery.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/jbd2/recovery.c b/fs/jbd2/recovery.c
index 7306328..59cc9c5 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/recovery.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/recovery.c
@@ -718,11 +718,16 @@ static int scan_revoke_records(journal_t *journal, struct buffer_head *bh,
 {
 	jbd2_journal_revoke_header_t *header;
 	int offset, max;
+	__u32 rcount;
 	int record_len = 4;

 	header = (jbd2_journal_revoke_header_t *) bh->b_data;
 	offset = sizeof(jbd2_journal_revoke_header_t);
-	max = be32_to_cpu(header->r_count);
+	rcount = be32_to_cpu(header->r_count);
+
+	if (rcount > journal->j_blocksize)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	max = rcount;

 	if (JBD2_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(journal, JBD2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_64BIT))
 		record_len = 8;
-- 
1.7.12.2.21.g234cd45.dirty

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/