[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150912225608.380720062@1wt.eu>
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 00:56:48 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@...app.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: [PATCH 2.6.32 42/62] fixing infinite OPEN loop in 4.0 stateid recovery
2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@...app.com>
commit e8d975e73e5fa05f983fbf2723120edcf68e0b38 upstream.
Problem: When an operation like WRITE receives a BAD_STATEID, even though
recovery code clears the RECLAIM_NOGRACE recovery flag before recovering
the open state, because of clearing delegation state for the associated
inode, nfs_inode_find_state_and_recover() gets called and it makes the
same state with RECLAIM_NOGRACE flag again. As a results, when we restart
looking over the open states, we end up in the infinite loop instead of
breaking out in the next test of state flags.
Solution: unset the RECLAIM_NOGRACE set because of
calling of nfs_inode_find_state_and_recover() after returning from calling
recover_open() function.
Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@...app.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
(cherry picked from commit ef8500b18fc4bb03286a93b6032d56ec7bcbfd15)
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4state.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
index 2a7f163..71ee6f6 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
@@ -929,6 +929,8 @@ restart:
__func__);
}
nfs4_put_open_state(state);
+ clear_bit(NFS4CLNT_RECLAIM_NOGRACE,
+ &state->flags);
goto restart;
}
}
--
1.7.12.2.21.g234cd45.dirty
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists