linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Sep 2015 09:54:25 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

Hi Yoshinori,

On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 07:40:33 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 07:43:04 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > The h8300 tree today has been based on linux-next.  This cannto work.
> > Please rebase this onto Linus' tree (or some other stable base).
> > 
> > I cannot use your tree in this state, so it will be dropped from
> > linux-next until it is fixed.  Also, Linus cannot pull it in this state.
> 
> And now your tree conatins lots and lots of very old commits that do
> not even have Signed-off-by tags :-(.  The version I have been using
> has a HEAD of commit:
> 
> 99bcfda85f66 "Revert "asm-generic: {get,put}_user ptr argument evaluate only 1 time""
> 
> (which, it turns out" also has no Signed-off-by :-()
> 
> Maybe you should reset your tree to that and try to move on from there.

Can you please clean this up ...

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/