[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55F68E44.5030109@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 17:07:16 +0800
From: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"Andi Kleen" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Raphael Beamonte <raphael.beamonte@...il.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 00/15] perf/core improvements and fixes
On 2015/9/14 16:41, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> Em Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 04:21:47PM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
>>> * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Em Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 10:06:28PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>>>>> Hi Ingo,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please consider pulling, this is on top of the previous pull request,
>>>>> perf-core-for-mingo.
>>>> Ingo, please do not pull this 'perf-core-for-mingo-2' tag, there were
>>>> some misunderstandings about the acks for "Move sw clock metrics
>>>> printout to stat-shadow" and Jiri and Andi are working that out.
>>>>
>>>> I'll remove those patches and get a new perf-core-for-mingo-2
>>>> tag in place, before continuing today's batch, which possibly will be
>>>> available as 'perf-core-for-mingo-3'
>>>>
>>>> What is in 'perf-core-for-mingo" should be Ok.
>>> Ok!
>> Thanks! I have already removed that problematic changeset and resigned
>> the 'perf-core-for-mingo-2' tag, same contents modulo that cset.
> Hm, so I pulled it (commit 1765d9b26f84), but with an old perf.data I'm getting
> this crash:
>
> triton:~/tip/tools/perf> perf report
> perf: Segmentation fault
> -------- backtrace --------
> perf[0x52bc0b]
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x352f0)[0x7f51a583c2f0]
> perf[0x42ce95]
> perf[0x4bc6c3]
> perf[0x4bcfa1]
> perf[0x4bf939]
> perf(perf_session__process_events+0x390)[0x4be430]
> perf(cmd_report+0x1070)[0x42e2e0]
> perf[0x478e03]
> perf(main+0x60a)[0x41f1ba]
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf0)[0x7f51a5827a40]
> perf(_start+0x29)[0x41f2d9]
> [0x0]
>
> I also re-tested qand it still crashes.
>
> Bisected it to:
>
> e1e499aba570 perf tools: Add processor socket info to hist_entry and addr_location
>
> Running on Ubuntu, 1 socket box, 12 CPUs.
Hi Ingo,
It seems you met a bug we are discussing these days. Please have a look at
the following discussions:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1441630315-189525-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1441828225-667-1-git-send-email-acme@kernel.org
Thank you.
> I went back to perf/core 8f3e5684d3fb and it doesn't crash anymore - so I unpulled
> your tree for now. (Will send you the perf.data privately.)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists