[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <55F6CCEB02000078000A28CC@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 05:34:35 -0600
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc: "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Ian.Campbell@...rix.com" <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
"julien.grall@...rix.com" <julien.grall@...rix.com>,
"Stefano Stabellini" <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
"Shannon Zhao" <zhaoshenglong@...wei.com>,
"leif.lindholm@...aro.org" <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>,
"shannon.zhao@...aro.org" <shannon.zhao@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xen.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
"Daniel Kiper" <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] efi/libstub/fdt: Standardize the names
of EFI stub parameters
>>> On 14.09.15 at 13:16, <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> wrote:
> (I still think not using SetVirtualAddressMap() at all
> would be the best approach for arm64, but unfortunately, most of my
> colleagues disagree with me)
Any reasons they have? I'm curious because we run x86 Xen without
using this function ...
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists