[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55F6D641.6010209@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 16:14:25 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>
Cc: minchan@...nel.org, sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com,
ddstreet@...e.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] allow zram to use zbud as underlying allocator
On 09/14/2015 04:12 PM, Vitaly Wool wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> wrote:
>>
>> On 09/14/2015 03:49 PM, Vitaly Wool wrote:
>>>
>>> While using ZRAM on a small RAM footprint devices, together with
>>> KSM,
>>> I ran into several occasions when moving pages from compressed swap back
>>> into the "normal" part of RAM caused significant latencies in system
>>
>>
>> I'm sure Minchan will want to hear the details of that :)
>>
>>> operation. By using zbud I lose in compression ratio but gain in
>>> determinism, lower latencies and lower fragmentation, so in the coming
>>
>>
>> I doubt the "lower fragmentation" part given what I've read about the design of zbud and zsmalloc?
>
> As it turns out, I see more cases of compaction kicking in and
> significantly more compact_stalls with zsmalloc.
Interesting, I thought that zsmalloc doesn't need contiguous high-order
pages.
> ~vitaly
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists