[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150914163954.GT22011@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 17:39:54 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>
Cc: bfields@...ldses.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] fs: add fput_queue
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:19:18AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > + * borrow the infrastructure used by kthreads, and the task can then just
> > > + * called flush_delayed_fput to ensure that the final fput has completed.
> >
> > Are you sure that it's not a typo?
>
> I don't think so, but it could be clearer. Something like this maybe?
>
> "then we can't queue it via task_work_add."
Huh?
task_work_add() callbacks *will* run before we return to userland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists