[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19236209.prUueVMe32@sifl>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 15:37:56 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Cc: v.rathor@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-audit@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved out by a new auditd
On Sunday, September 13, 2015 12:08:19 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 15/09/11, Paul Moore wrote:
> > Although I suppose if nothing else we could send a record indicating
> > that another auditd attempted to replace it ... if we can send it
> > great, drop the new request and be glad we audited it, if we can't
> > send it, reset the auditd tracking.
>
> This is actually a good idea.
This would go well with your last patch to try harder on netlink send
failures. On a related note, with the merge window closed I just rotated the
audit tree so that patch is now in linux-audit#next.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists