[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxYQ4bfBbyG97W=Yrzf+tpezrvktBBb=DmFX1we2+mdrw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 13:06:25 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs-writeback: drop wb->list_lock during blk_finish_plug()
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> wrote:
>
> Really need to run these numbers on slower disks where block layer
> merging makes a difference to performance.
Yeah. We've seen plugging and io schedulers not make much difference
for high-performance flash (although I think the people who argued
that noop should generally be used for non-rotating media were wrong,
I think - the elevator ends up still being critical to merging, and
while merging isn't a life-or-death situation, it tends to still
help).
For rotating rust with nasty seek times, the plugging is likely to
make the biggest difference.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists