linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ahci: qoriq: fixed using uninitialized variable warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:04:56 +0800
From:	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To:	Yuantian Tang <Yuantian.Tang@...escale.com>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	"hdegoede@...hat.com" <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
	"linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ahci: qoriq: fixed using uninitialized variable warnings

Yuantian,

It's cross compiling on ARCH=openrisc.

Thanks,
Fengguang

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 03:02:27AM +0000, Yuantian Tang wrote:
> Hello Tejun,
> 
> The toolchain I used is:
> gcc version 4.8.3 20140401 (prerelease) (Linaro GCC 4.8-2014.04)
> 
> I have not found this warning using this tool chain with -Wuninitialized flag.
> 
> Regards,
> Yuantian 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tejun Heo [mailto:htejun@...il.com] On Behalf Of Tejun Heo
> > Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 9:55 PM
> > To: Tang Yuantian-B29983 <Yuantian.Tang@...escale.com>
> > Cc: hdegoede@...hat.com; linux-ide@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> > kernel@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; Fengguang Wu
> > <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] ahci: qoriq: fixed using uninitialized variable warnings
> > 
> > Hello, Yuantian.
> > 
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 05:27:25AM +0000, Yuantian Tang wrote:
> > > Hi Tejun,
> > >
> > > Could you please take the version 1 patch?
> > > The version 2 patch can't address these warnings, and the version 1 can
> > definitely remove them.
> > > In this case, that would cause any hidden bugs, so no worries.
> > 
> > Ugh... I really hate changes which are made to just work around compiler
> > silliness.  If this is something which goes away with newer gcc, Fengguang can
> > just make it as a known false positive.  Yuantian, which compiler are you
> > using?
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > --
> > tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/