linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] platform/chrome: Support reading/writing the vboot context

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150915202218.GA25914@kroah.com>
Date:	Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:22:18 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>
Cc:	Emilio López <emilio.lopez@...labora.co.uk>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozłowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
	<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] platform/chrome: Support reading/writing the
 vboot context

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:43:35PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Emilio,
> 
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Emilio López
> <emilio.lopez@...labora.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> >>>
> >>>   obj-$(CONFIG_CHROMEOS_LAPTOP)  += chromeos_laptop.o
> >>>   obj-$(CONFIG_CHROMEOS_PSTORE)  += chromeos_pstore.o
> >>> -cros_ec_devs-objs               := cros_ec_dev.o cros_ec_sysfs.o
> >>> cros_ec_lightbar.o
> >>> +cros_ec_devs-objs               := cros_ec_dev.o
> >>> +cros_ec_devs-objs               += cros_ec_lightbar.o
> >>> +cros_ec_devs-objs               += cros_ec_sysfs.o
> >>> +cros_ec_devs-objs               += cros_ec_vbc.o
> >>
> >>
> >> Why are you changing the Makefile? AFAIK += is usually used when the
> >> compilation is conditional based on a Kconfig symbol but since these
> >> are build unconditionally, I'll just keep it as foo := bar baz
> >
> >
> > As far as I'm aware, += is append[0]. It's used for stuff like
> > obj-$(CONFIG_CHROMEOS_LAPTOP)  += chromeos_laptop.o
> > because the left part will resolve to "obj-y" or similar, and you want to
> > add to it, not replace it. I only changed the Makefile here because the line
> > was growing too long, and I thought it looked neater this way; it shouldn't
> > cause any functional change apart from the intended one.
> >
> > [0] https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Appending.html
> >
> 
> Yes, I know how Kbuild works. What I tried to say is that you usually
> append based on a Kconfig symbol. In fact even you are mentioning such
> an example.
> So appending unconditionally like you are doing makes the Makefile
> harder to read IMHO. If the line grows to long you can use a backlash
> (\) char to split the line.

Either format is just fine, don't get too picky here please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/