linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] soc: ti: display firmware file name as part of boot log

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:20:01 -0700
From:	santosh shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
To:	Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
	linux@....linux.org.uk, ssantosh@...nel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] soc: ti: display firmware file name as part of
 boot log

On 9/15/2015 11:14 AM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
> On 09/09/2015 12:38 PM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
>> On 09/04/2015 11:53 PM, santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com wrote:
>>> On 9/4/15 5:46 PM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
>>>> To help the user, print the PDSP file name as part of
>>>> knav_queue_load_pdsp(). This will be useful for users to know what
>>>> version of the firmware is loaded to PDSP. Also update the
>>>> document for the location of the QMSS accumulator PDSP firmware.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Looks fine. Will pick both the patches.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks Santhosh.
>>
>> Is there a requirement to add the firmware to linux-firmware.git. Right
>> now I have provided link to ti git repo that has the firmware. I have
>> the patch ready in case this is required. Do you know?
>>
>> Murali
>>> Regards,
>>> Santosh
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> Santosh,
>
> I have checked v4.3-rc1 and I don't see it. Did you send the pull request?
>
They are in the queue fo 4.4-rc1. They were too late for 4.3.
You might know already, typically as a rule of thumb followed
on arm-soc, we need to get patches reviewed/acked by rc4 to make
it for next merge window.
Ofcourse genuine bug fixes can make it to the same cycle.

Regards,
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/