linux-kernel - Re: When would be preempt_rt patchet available for 4.2 kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAA7rmPEAMYumStvfK1L5s1sRRGj=aD7AgJMFrH-4T-Qzez01pg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 15 Sep 2015 08:49:25 +0200
From:	Daniel Vacek <neelx.g@...il.com>
To:	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Jaggi, Manish" <Manish.Jaggi@...iumnetworks.com>,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: When would be preempt_rt patchet available for 4.2 kernel

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Mike Galbraith
<umgwanakikbuti@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 19:11 +0200, Daniel Vacek wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>> > I'm not going to support 4.2.  We switched to odd numbers due to 4.1
>> > being a LTS kernel.
>>
>> That's odd.
>
> Not really.  Maintaining rt is hard work.  Try it, you'll see that it
> can eat large piles of your free time.  There's nothing odd about people
> wanting to invest some of their free time in.. oh, say having a life.

And what about your sense of humour, Mike? ;-)

--nX
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/