linux-kernel - why is text address constant with full randomization?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD-N9QVQiWXkv9PYs8Hqw7jryCUKqeaeyWc-rWzMODc0Zu0KTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 15 Sep 2015 16:36:11 +0800
From:	慕冬亮 <mudongliangabcd@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: why is text address constant with full randomization?

First, my linux kernel is Linux 114-212-83-136 4.1.0-2-amd64.
Second, I copy /bin/cat in system to mycat , and see the address space
layout below.

mdl@...-212-83-136:~$ ./mycat /proc/self/maps
00400000-0040c000 r-xp 00000000 08:03 1046776
 /home/mdl/mycat
0060b000-0060c000 r--p 0000b000 08:03 1046776
 /home/mdl/mycat
0060c000-0060d000 rw-p 0000c000 08:03 1046776
 /home/mdl/mycat
01da7000-01dc8000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0
 [heap]
......

The starting address of executable image is constant with my aslr
configuration 2 (full randomization).
I think text segment should be inconstant to defeat the attack like
reusing text code!
Is it related to fixing offset2lib attack?
Thanks for any help!
    - mudongliang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/